UAP
Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (formerly Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) — the U.S. government's preferred term for what was historically called UFOs, deliberately broader to include maritime, space, and transmedium objects.
UAP has, in U.S. government usage, expanded twice in scope since the term was first formalized.
Iteration 1: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
The 2021 ODNI Preliminary Assessment introduced “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena” as a deliberate replacement for “UFO” — the older term carrying decades of pop-culture baggage. UAP, in this initial framing, referred specifically to airborne objects of unknown origin.
Iteration 2: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
In 2022, with the establishment of AARO and the recognition that anomalous phenomena occurred across multiple domains (maritime, space, transmedium), the U.S. government redefined UAP as “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.” The acronym was preserved; the meaning broadened to encompass any anomalous phenomenon across operational domains.
Why the rebrand matters
The term’s evolution reflects two institutional shifts:
- De-stigmatization. “UFO” carried cultural connotations that made serious institutional engagement difficult. UAP was deliberately neutralized.
- Domain expansion. Cases like the USS Omaha encounter (Case #00088), with an object descending into the ocean, and the Aguadilla CBP video (Case #00067), with apparent transmedium behavior, did not fit the “aerial” framing.
Council usage
The Council uses UAP in its current government-standard sense (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) when discussing modern cases and the institutional record. We use UFO when quoting historical material that uses the older term, when the case predates the UAP rebrand, or when the cultural-historical reference is what is meant. Both terms refer to phenomena lacking a confirmed conventional explanation, not to confirmed extraterrestrial or non-human origins.