Tic Tac
Colloquial name for the oblong, white object reported by USS Nimitz F/A-18 aircrews during the November 2004 encounter off Baja California — and, by extension, the case itself (Council Case #00041).
“Tic Tac” is the colloquial name in modern UAP discourse for two related referents:
- The specific oblong, white, smooth-surfaced object described by U.S. Navy F/A-18 aircrews from the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group during the November 2004 encounter off Baja California — described as resembling a Tic Tac breath mint in shape and color.
- The case as a whole — the Nimitz Tic Tac encounter — documented in the Council’s archive as Case #00041.
The object’s reported characteristics
According to the most-cited testimony — from Cmdr. David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Jim Slaight, the F/A-18F aircrew that visually engaged the contact on 14 November 2004:
- Approximately 40 feet long, oblong, white or off-white in color.
- Smooth, featureless surface without visible exhaust, control surfaces, or windows.
- Hovered above a disturbance in the ocean surface.
- Demonstrated rapid acceleration outside the publicly-known performance envelope of any contemporary aircraft.
- Apparently anticipated Fravor’s intercept attempt, mirroring his maneuver before accelerating away.
Significance
The Tic Tac case is, in the Council’s assessment, the modern reference standard for what a credible UAP report looks like:
- Multi-sensor data: USS Princeton AEGIS radar, F/A-18 onboard radar, FLIR1 infrared video.
- Multi-witness: Multiple aircrews and ship’s company over multiple days.
- Officially authenticated: DoD confirmed the FLIR video as authentic Navy material in April 2020.
- Sworn congressional testimony: Fravor’s 2023 testimony before the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee.
- Inclusion in the 2021 ODNI report as one of the cases the Intelligence Community could not fully account for.
”Tic Tac” as iconography
The term has, in modern UAP discourse, taken on iconographic weight beyond the specific object. It is now widely used as a generic descriptor for any oblong, smooth, white UAP — somewhat as “flying saucer” was used in the 1950s. The Council uses “Tic Tac” only when referring to the specific Nimitz case or its direct extensions; we avoid the term for unrelated cases that happen to involve oblong objects.
Council verdict
Case #00041 carries a verdict of Inconclusive. The evidentiary record is strong enough to require explanation; no proposed mundane explanation accounts for the full multi-sensor, multi-witness pattern; recovered physical evidence does not exist; the case stands open in the Council’s archive.